Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
George Berka v. City of Middletown, Connecticut, et al.
Paid petition · Appellate Court of Connecticut, No. AC 43853 · judgment June 8, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Did the subject, February 14th; 2018 Blight Citation that the Defendant City had issued to. the Plaintiff, violate many of the Plaintiffs important constitutional safeguards? ’ t TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES n INTRODUCTION 1 OPINIONS BELOW 3 JURISDICTION 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE 4 STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED 11 REASON FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 11 CONCLUSION 12 • Page | i
Counsel of record
For petitioner
George Berka
For respondent
Brigham Smith
City of Middletown
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 12, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 12 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
- Sep 21 2021Waiver of right of respondent Middletown, CT, et al. to respond filed.
- Aug 27 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 12, 2021)