Guangcun Huang v. Tim Hui-Ming Huang, et al.

Whether this Court’s decisions interpreting the Eleventh Amendment, see e.g. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer; Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney, bar Title VII and other claims against UTHSCSA even when UTHSCSA explicitly and voluntarily invoked federal jurisdiction before being served

Whether Petitioner had provided sufficient factual pleadings of Title VII claim when he met all Fifth Circuit’s requests to do so

Whether this Court’s decisions interpreting the Eleventh Amendment, see e.g. Edelman v. Jordan; Ex parte Young, bar actions against state officials

Whether this Court’s decisions interpreting the First Amendment, see e.g. American Communications Assn. v. Douds; Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm’n; Kingsley Books, Inc. u. Brown,; Jones u. Opelika,; Tory v. Cochran, bar UTHSCSA from selectively subjecting academic scientist Petitioner to thought-probing in academic setting

Whether this Court’s decisions interpreting the First Amendment, see e.g. Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U. S. 563, 574 (1968); Connick u. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 146 (1983); Garcetti v. Cehallos, 547 US 410, 425, 438 (2006), protect an academic employee’s speech, outside of performing his official duties, on research misconduct over an external event in international research community

Whether Petitioner has standing to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief when suffering ongoing violation of federal law and request damages and equity relief