Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Joseph Constant v. DTE Electric Company, aka DTE Energy, aka Detroit Edison Company, aka DTE, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 20-1514 · judgment April 29, 2021


Certiorari denied · November 8, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

In 1936, Halsted L. Ritter, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida was Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, March 2, 1936, on charges of favoritism in the appointment of bankruptcy receivers and practicing law while sitting as a judge; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, April 17, 1936. Other judges that made similar acts to Ritter's and met the same similar fates are-

  1. Robert W. Archbald, Commerce Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, July 11, 1912, on charges of improper business relationship with litigants; Convict* ed by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, January 13, 1913.

  2. Alcee L. Hastings, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, August 3, 1988, on charges of perjury and conspiring to solicit a bribe; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, October 20, 1989.

  3. G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, March 11, 2010, on charges of accepting bribes and making false statements under penalty of perjury; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, December 8, 2010. The source of the above information ishttps V/historv.house.gov/Institution/Impeachment/Impeachment-List/

  4. There is a Michigan judges RICO Enterprise that was involved in the pro­ ceedings of the lower courts both state and federal.

  5. The Enterprise is an illegal, illicit law-firm that is owned, managed, oper­ ated, controlled and directed by Michigan judges which includes but are not limited to Kumar, Matthews, Grant, Warren, Chabot, Servitto, Becker* ing and Ft Hood

  6. The Enterprise is masked, cloaked and disguised in business by attorney Lincoln G Herweyer, Timothy Young, and the Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho PLC and they have posed as attorneys for the Enterprise's client - DTE.

  7. DTE has an open contract with the Enterprise for litigation services in PO A32211400. n

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Joseph Constant

For respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud
Michigan Department of Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Jan 10 2022
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Dec 22 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
  3. Nov 30 2021
  4. Nov 08 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Oct 22 2021
    Waiver of Deborah A. Servitto, Jane M. Beckering, and Karen M. Fort Hood of right to respond not accepted for filing. (October 22, 2021)
  6. Oct 20 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
  7. Aug 31 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)