Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Jody Tremayne Wafer
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Federal marijuana laws are constitutional because marijuana is not a fundamental right. Judicial review of these criminal laws has been rational basis, a political question. Petitioner is a political prisoner. Marijuana laws are a political question because of ineffective assistance of officers of the court.
-
Whether “liberty” in the due process clause still means freedom from physical restraint by government police power?
-
Whether the operation and effects of the marijuana laws are an Article III case and controversy?
-
Whether being incarcerated is a substantial denial of Jody Tremayne Wafer’s constitutional right of liberty without compelling reasons for Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, therefore without due process of law in violation of Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States and is unconstitutional?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jody Tremayne Wafer
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 09 2021