Rosemary Garity v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General

The questions presented show conflict with Precedent of this Court and all Circuit Courts. The significant practical consequence is promotion of discrimination without remedy and encouragement of Courts to rule contrary to law.

1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in upholding sanctions against pro se, denial of damages and right to a jury trial, when admitting not supported by the record, contrary to the Supreme Court and other Circuit Courts?

2. Did the Ninth Circuit err, in contrast to all Circuit Courts and the Supreme Court, when subtracting a contract grievance settlement from the discrimination award and denying make whole remedy, including front pay/restoration, costs, expenses, promotion, benefits and back pay, for found discrimination?

3. Did the Ninth Circuit err in determining constructive discharge contrary to the undisputed record evidence and the Supreme Court and the other Circuit Courts?

4. Did the Ninth Circuit err in denying expert witness fees to pro se because not an attorney, with expert approved by the Judge? Is this contrary to Fourteenth Amendment, make whole remedy and in conflict with Circuit and Supreme Courts?

5. Did the Ninth Circuit err in upholding order requiring pencil documents in a legal proceeding without copy to petitioner contrary to law and legal practice?

6. Was the denial of recusal, when becoming part of the accusatory process and upon multiple declarations of appearance of bias, contrary to Supreme Court and Circuit Court law?