Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Robyn Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 19-2435 · judgment March 30, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right and, in the context of contracts, occurs when one party to a contract either explicitly repudiates its rights under the contract or acts in a manner inconsistent with an intention of exercising them. In the opinion below, the Eighth Circuit joined eight other federal courts of appeals and most state supreme courts in grafting an additional requirement onto the waiver analysis when the contract at issue happens to involve arbitration-requiring the party asserting waiver to show that the waiving party's inconsistent acts caused prejudice. Three other federal courts of appeal, and the supreme courts of at least four states, do not include prejudice as an essential element of proving waiver of the right to arbitrate. The question presented is: Does the arbitration-specific requirement that the proponent of a contractual waiver defense prove prejudice violate this Court's instruction that lower courts must "place arbitration agreements on an equal footing with other contracts?" AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339 (2011).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Karla Ann Gilbride
Public Justice, P.C.
For respondent
Paul D. Clement
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
8 merits
(5 supporting pet./neither, 3 respondent)
Argument & decision
Argued March 21, 2022 — Karla A. Gilbride · Paul D. Clement. Audio and transcript
Decided May 23, 2022. Opinion by Kagan.
Proceedings
- Jun 24 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED
- May 23 2022Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
- Mar 21 2022Argued. For petitioner: Karla A. Gilbride, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.
- Mar 11 2022Reply of petitioner Robyn Morgan filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 11 2022CIRCULATED
- Feb 11 2022Brief amicus curiae of Restaurant Law Center filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 11 2022Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 09 2022Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
- Feb 04 2022Brief of respondent Sundance, Inc. filed.
- Jan 28 2022ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, March 21, 2022.
- Jan 26 2022Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.
- Jan 18 2022Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Robyn Morgan
- Jan 06 2022Brief amicus curiae of The National Academy of Arbitrators filed.
- Jan 06 2022Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.
- Jan 06 2022Brief amici curiae of Minnesota, Maryland, et al. filed.
- Jan 06 2022Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen filed.
- Jan 05 2022Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed.
- Dec 30 2021Brief of petitioner Robyn Morgan filed.
- Dec 30 2021Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
- Dec 29 2021Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Sundance, Inc.
- Dec 15 2021Application (21A215) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file the reply brief on the merits until March 11, 2022.
- Dec 15 2021Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including February 4, 2022.
- Nov 30 2021Motion for an extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits filed.
- Nov 30 2021Application (21A215) to extend the time to file a reply brief on the merits to March 11, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
- Nov 15 2021Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law Professors GRANTED.
- Nov 15 2021Petition GRANTED.
- Nov 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
- Oct 20 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
- Oct 15 2021Reply of petitioner Robyn Morgan filed.
- Oct 01 2021Brief of respondent Sundance, Inc. in opposition filed.
- Sep 29 2021Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law Professors.
- Aug 27 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)