Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al. v. Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost, Attorney General

Paid petition · Supreme Court of Ohio, No. 2020-0092 · judgment June 29, 2021


Certiorari denied · November 15, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a petition filed soon after the judgment below and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Question presented

Title II of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) grants the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) broad and exclusive authority to enforce auto manufacturers’ compliance with CAA standards over the entire useful life of their vehicles. To avoid conflicting regulation, Congress directed that “[n]o State or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions from new motor vehicles . . . .” 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a). Exercising its authority, EPA reached a multi-billiondollar resolution with petitioners relating to, among other things, post-sale software updates made to their vehicles on a nationwide basis. Certain state and local governments nonetheless brought unprecedented lawsuits seeking substantial additional penalties based on the same updates. The Ohio Supreme Court below—following a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and deepening a direct conflict with final decisions of the Alabama Supreme Court and intermediate appellate courts in Tennessee and Minnesota—held that all 50 states and thousands of local governments may freely regulate manufacturers’ post-sale, nationwide updates to vehicle emission systems. The question presented is whether the CAA preempts state and local governments from regulating manufacturers’ post-sale, nationwide updates to vehicle emission systems. (I)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert J. Giuffra Jr.
Sullivan & Cromwell

For respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
4 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Nov 15 2021
    Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
  2. Oct 27 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
  3. Oct 26 2021
    Reply of petitioners Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  4. Oct 08 2021
    Brief of respondent State of Ohio ex rel. Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General in opposition filed.
  5. Sep 30 2021
    Brief amici curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., et al. filed.
  6. Sep 30 2021
    Brief amici curiae of International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers, et al. filed.
  7. Sep 30 2021
    Brief amici curiae of Alliance for Automotive Innovation, et al. filed.
  8. Sep 30 2021
    Brief amici curiae of Former Environmental Protection Agency, et al. filed.
  9. Sep 15 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 1, 2021.
  10. Sep 14 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 30, 2021 to November 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. Sep 03 2021
    Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
  12. Aug 27 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 30, 2021)