Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Cammie L. Marceaux v. Tiffany & Bosco, P.A., et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0600 · judgment June 25, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

of this Court of last resort. Has the Only Power Enlisted in it to rule upon the Land and the Law’s of this Land that our very own “Constitution Of The United States”, has enacted upon it to Rule in Matters Pertaining to the Rights of the Citizens of The United States to Enact for them. To Protect them when in fact Their Life Their Liberty and or Their Right to Property have been Violated and or Infringed upon. There has been no other Prior States Justices Courts that have yet to act. Based on the Laws of the Land to Act for the Life, Liberty and or the Property BELONGING TO THE Owner Cammie L. Marceaux.

  1. The Question Under the Constitution 5th and 14th Amendment Clearly Identifies the Questions Before this court Was Cammie’s Privileges or Immunities of Citizenship in the United States Deprived of Peaceful Enjoyment in her Life her Liberties and the Quiet Enjoyment of her Property?

  2. Was Cammie Deprived of Equal Protections under the Laws of the Land that was afforded to her Under the Constitution Of The United State and Afforded Judicial D ue Process in a Court Of Law? A. Where, a Hearing be set, and Evidence could be presented an expert witness to the Property issues be heard? Under the Constitution in the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution does it not state that Property Owners have the Right to Due Process?

  3. In the taken Clause of the 5th Amendment in the Constitution comes into question here. Cammie’s Property worth $230,000 was taken for $16,000. Was Cammie’s Property taken for Just Compensation?

  4. Would it not be Unconstitutional to Not allow a standing at all in any Court to bring Evidence that Proves a Lack of Standing by a Trustee acting on an invalid Transfer of Authorizations to act upon a Illegally Deposited Mortgage Note into a Trust 13 Years after the closing date of that Trust?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Cammie L. Marceaux

For respondent
Brian J. Cosper
Fidelity National Law Group

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Nov 15 2021
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Oct 27 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
  3. Oct 12 2021
  4. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Aug 18 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  6. Aug 03 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. to respond filed.
  7. Jul 30 2021
    Waiver of right of respondents Fidelity National Title Agency, Inc. and Lawyers Title Agency to respond filed.
  8. Jun 16 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)