Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations Ltd. v. Mark Boughton
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 20-1044 · judgment February 8, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether Connecticut impermissibly regulates or controls conduct beyond the boundaries of the State in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors doing no business in Connecticut and having no nexus with Connecticut.
-
Whether Connecticut violates Due Process protections when it bans a manufacturer’s products from being sold in the state, if the manufacturer fails to obtain and provide to Connecticut private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors relating to their distribution of products in jurisdictions other than Connecticut.
-
Whether Connecticut violates the Supremacy Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors who conduct no business in Connecticut nor distribute the manufacturer’s products to, or in, Connecticut.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kelli Jean Keegan
Barnhouse Keegan Solimon & West LLP
For respondent
Joseph James Chambers
Connecticut Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 17 2021Reply of petitioner Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 15 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Nov 24 2021Motion of Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. for an extension of time not accepted for filing. See Rule 15.6. (November 29, 2021)
- Nov 19 2021Brief of respondent Mark Boughton in opposition filed.
- Sep 08 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2021.
- Sep 07 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2021 to November 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 23 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)