Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Arrow Highway Steel, Inc. v. Robert Dubin
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B303289 · judgment October 29, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the dormant commerce clause may be used to invalidate the application of a state's neutral, non-discriminatory tolling statute to defeat the enforcement of a former resident's stipulated judgment where there is no showing of any burden on or discrimination against interstate commerce.
-
Whether the dormant commerce clause applies to a state statute with no intended or demonstrated effect on interstate commerce.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Paul Lindsey Hoffman
Schonbrun Seplow Harris Hoffman & Zeldes LLP
For respondent
David Michael Almaraz
Alpert, Barr & Grant, A Professional Law Corporation
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 7 conferences
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2022Petition DENIED.
- Feb 11 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
- Jan 18 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
- Jan 10 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
- Jan 03 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 06 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
- Nov 16 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
- Nov 10 2021Reply of petitioner Arrow Highway Steel, Inc. filed.
- Oct 27 2021Brief of respondent Robert Dubin in opposition filed.
- Sep 27 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 29, 2021.
- Sep 17 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 29, 2021 to October 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 30 2021Response Requested. (Due September 29, 2021)
- Aug 18 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 28 2021Waiver of right of respondent Robert Dubin to respond filed.
- Jul 07 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)