Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Khamraj Lall v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 19-3290 · judgment March 23, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether or not the Trial Judge erred in not having an on-therecord colloquy with the defendant outside the presence of the jury to enquire if the defendant wished to exercise his/her right to testify, or wished to affirmatively exercise a waiver that Constitutional right?
-
Whether or not the refusal of a defendant's counsel of record to file for a Speedy Trial Violation and Pre-Indictment Delay Motions, while instructed to do so, precludes the defendant from asserting his right to file the Speedy Trial Violation Motion and constitutes a Constitutional Violation of his right to Due Process?
-
Whether the defendant’s Due Process and Speedy Trial rights were violated when the government return two(2) indictments in two(2) separate Federal District Courts for the same underlying offense, at the same time using a summary of the Grand Jury transcript from the first indictment, testimony from the same witnesses, and informing the Grand Jury in both Districts as to the contents of proffers between the defendant and the government?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Khamraj Lall
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- Dec 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Nov 02 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Nov 02 2021Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis.
- Oct 12 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 15 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
- Sep 10 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 10 2021