Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Probir Kumar Bondyopadhyay v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2020-2091 · judgment March 11, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The question before the Honorable U.S. Supreme Court is on the recognition and affirmation of the Jeffersonian claim of an original creature of the U.S. Constitution against the United States under Article 1 Section 8 Clause 8 arising out of admittedly unauthorized and intentional use (over a continuous period of 12 years 7 months and 16 days) of a patented U.S. invention vital for U.S. National Defense on which the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (USCFC) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued no judgment (even under CAFC Rule 40 and CAFC Rule 35). [Appendix-A, Appendix-B and Appendix-C]. This petitioner, a U.S. Citizen sole independent inventor and sole owner of the patented (US 6,292,134) U.S. invention (of a very large Phased Array Antenna system architecture for modernization of Air Force Satellite Control Network) was accorded the status of the said original creature of the U.S. Constitution by the CAFC (0:2018cvus01674) with its mandate issued on September 7, 2018. The applicable exclusive constitutional law Title 28 USC Section 1498(a) was not applied to the admitted facts by the USCFC (Appendix-C) thus interrupting the progress of science and necessary improvements in U.S. National Defense capabilities. -l-
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Probir Kumar Bondyopadhyay
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 12 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
- Sep 15 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 17 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)