Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Philip E. Berger, et al. v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 19-2273 · judgment June 7, 2021


Decided · June 23, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 12% cert probability (95% interval 8%–17%)

Before the decision, about 2.8× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a petition filed soon after the judgment below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Questions presented

  1. Whether a state agent authorized by state law to defend the State's interest in litigation must overcome a presumption of adequate representation to intervene as of right in a case in which a state official is a defendant.

  2. Whether a district court's determination of adequate representation in ruling on a motion to intervene as of right is reviewed de novo or for abuse of discretion.

  3. Whether Petitioners are entitled to intervene as of right in this litigation.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David H. Thompson
Cooper & Kirk, PLLC

For respondent
Ryan Young Park
North Carolina Department of Justice

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Amicus briefs
12 merits
(12 supporting pet./neither)

Argument & decision

Argued March 21, 2022 — David H. Thompson · Elisabeth S. Theodore · Sarah Boyce. Audio and transcript

Decided June 23, 2022. Opinion by Gorsuch.

Proceedings

  1. Jul 25 2022
    JUDGMENT ISSUED
  2. Jun 23 2022
    Judgment REVERSED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
  3. Mar 21 2022
    Argued. For petitioners: David H. Thompson, Washington, D. C. For NAACP respondents: Elisabeth S. Theodore, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Sarah Boyce, Deputy Solicitor General, Raleigh, N. C.
  4. Mar 08 2022
    Reply of petitioners Philip E. Berger, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  5. Mar 07 2022
    Motion for divided argument filed by respondents GRANTED.
  6. Feb 16 2022
    Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts Scholars filed. (Distributed)
  7. Feb 16 2022
    Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. (Distributed)
  8. Feb 16 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Former North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Robert F. Orr filed. (Distributed)
  9. Feb 16 2022
    Brief amici curiae of Minnesota, Wisconsin, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  10. Feb 16 2022
    Motion for divided argument filed by respondents.
  11. Feb 16 2022
    Record received from the U.S.D.A. North Carolina Middle District has been electronically filed.
  12. Feb 11 2022
    CIRCULATED
  13. Feb 09 2022
  14. Feb 09 2022
    Brief of State respondents filed. (Distributed)
  15. Jan 28 2022
    ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, March 21, 2022.
  16. Jan 26 2022
    Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.
  17. Jan 18 2022
    Brief amici curiae of Lawyers Democracy Fund and Rep. Rodney Davis filed.
  18. Jan 18 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of American Legislative Exchange Council filed.
  19. Jan 18 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Republican National Committee filed.
  20. Jan 18 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Honest Elections Project filed.
  21. Jan 18 2022
    Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed.
  22. Jan 17 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Republican State Leadership Committee filed.
  23. Jan 17 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.
  24. Jan 17 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin Legislature filed.
  25. Jan 10 2022
    Brief of petitioners Philip E. Berger, et al. filed.
  26. Jan 10 2022
    Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed)
  27. Nov 24 2021
    Petition GRANTED.
  28. Nov 15 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
  29. Oct 27 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
  30. Oct 27 2021
    Reply of petitioners Philip E. Berger, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  31. Oct 13 2021
    Waiver of right of respondents North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, Chapel Hill-Carrboro NAACP, Greensboro NAACP, High Point NAACP, Moore County NAACP, Stokes County Branch of the NAACP, Winston Salem-Forsyth County NAACP to respond filed.
  32. Oct 13 2021
    Brief of respondents Damon Circosta, et al. in opposition filed.
  33. Aug 27 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 13, 2021.
  34. Aug 26 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2021 to October 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  35. Aug 19 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2021)