Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Curt Daniels, et al. v. John Holtz, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Iowa, No. 19-1674 · judgment March 26, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
What are the parameters of constitutionally acceptable dismissal and dismissal that rises to unconstitutional violation of due process?
-
Is a final judgment setting aside a judicial sale confer a property right under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution that is immune from invalidation by res judicata, claim preclusion?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Curt Nichols Daniels
Daniels Law Firm
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 4, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Aug 25 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 30 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)