Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Veena Sharma v. Domenic S. Terranova, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 20-1363 · judgment March 8, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim without issuing summons to Respondent, without any hearing, and without jury trial as requested by Petitioner is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Supreme Court.
-
Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim on wrong/incorrect interpretation of Statue of Limitations (10 years) is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Superior Court.
-
Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim on grounds of Preclusion is sufficient for review by the honorable Untied States Supreme Court. -It
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Veena Sharma
For respondent
Peter J. Caruso II
Caruso & Caruso, LLP
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Orders
Order list, October 18, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Order list, January 10, 2022 · Rehearing denied
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- Dec 15 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Nov 12 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Nov 12 2021Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
- Oct 18 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 29 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
- Aug 26 2021Waiver of right of respondent Peter J. Caruso, Sr. to respond filed.
- Aug 05 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2021)