Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Wisconsin v. Mark D. Jensen
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Wisconsin, No. 2018AP1952-CR · judgment March 18, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Before Julie Jensen died, she told a police officer acquaintance that she was not suicidal and that if she died, the police should look at her husband, Mark Jensen, as a suspect. The Wisconsin Supreme Court held that these statements were testimonial hearsay whose admission violated Jensen’s confrontation rights at his trial for killing Julie. The questions presented are:
-
Can a person’s statement expressing fear about a possible future crime be testimonial under the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause?
-
When a person reports ongoing psychological domestic abuse and expresses fear about future physical harm, is the person’s statement aimed at ending an ongoing emergency such that it is non-testimonial?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Arthur Blimling
Wisconsin Department of Justice
For respondent
Andrea Taylor Cornwall
Wisconsin State Public Defender
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 6 conferences
Proceedings
- May 03 2022Record returned to the Kenosha County Circuit Court (WI) (flash drive).
- May 03 2022Record returned to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals (1 envelope).
- Feb 22 2022Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
- Feb 22 2022Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Feb 11 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
- Feb 02 2022Record received from the Kenosha County Circuit Court (WI) (flash drive).
- Jan 18 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
- Jan 10 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
- Jan 03 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 20 2021Record received from the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals (1 envelope).
- Dec 13 2021Record Requested.
- Nov 29 2021Reply of petitioner Wisconsin filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
- Nov 09 2021Brief of respondent Mark D. Jensen in opposition filed.
- Nov 09 2021Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Mark D. Jensen.
- Oct 08 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including November 9, 2021.
- Oct 07 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2021 to November 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 15 2021Response Requested. (Due October 15, 2021)
- Sep 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Sep 03 2021Waiver of right of respondent Mark D. Jensen to respond filed.
- Aug 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 13, 2021)