Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Mohammad Sharif Khalil v. Ur Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55323 · judgment March 12, 2021


Certiorari denied · December 13, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) identifies various “terrorist activities” that render a noncitizen inadmissible. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B). The REAL ID Act of 2005 amended the INA to, among other things, add a ground of inadmissibility for receipt of “military-type training . . . from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)).” Id. § 1182(a) (3)(B)(i)(VIII). No other terrorism-related grounds of inadmissibility under § 1182 include the language “at the time” to describe the conduct at issue. In the early–mid 1980s, Petitioner Mohammad Sharif Khalil fought against the Soviets with the U.S.-backed and trained war-time ally known as Jamiat-i-Islami (Jamiat). Mr. Khalil disclosed his background with Jamiat and was granted asylum in 2000. In its 2019 denial of Mr. Khalil’s application to adjust status, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services claimed that beginning in the late 1980s, Jamiat qualified as an undesignated “Tier III” terrorist organization under § 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the INA, as amended by the PATRIOT Act of 2001. The question presented is: Whether the INA, as amended by the REAL ID Act, permits the government to retroactively deem a noncitizen inadmissible for receiving military-type training from or on behalf of a group that the United States did not consider a terrorist organization “at the time” of his training.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Kathryn Helen Brady
Constitutional Law Center for Muslims in America

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Dec 13 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 23 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
  3. Nov 19 2021
    Reply of petitioner Mohammad Sharif Khalil filed. (Distributed)
  4. Nov 09 2021
    Brief of respondents Jaddou, Ur, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 06 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including November 9, 2021.
  6. Oct 05 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 12, 2021 to November 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Sep 02 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 12, 2021.
  8. Sep 01 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 10, 2021 to October 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Aug 09 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 10, 2021)