Yvonne Reignat-Vodi v. Motor Vehicle Administration

' (i) Did the courts follow the Procedural Due process subject to the 14th Amendment due process protection? (ii) Did the courts violate the rule and the right to presentation of the Sixth Amendment right to Counsel, under those circumstances the court failed to provide Counsel for petitioner? (iii) Did the courts follow the Civil Due Process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments the right for Petitioner to present evidences, witnesses or just based solely on the evidences presented by the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration? (iv) Can a court deny the filed Writ of Certiorari without providing explanation as to why the Writ of Certiorari was not desirable in public interest but proceed with a dismissal of the case without a trial? (v) Did the Maryland State courts ignore the fundamental principles of due process in rejecting the case of Shepherds driving school? (vi) Whether a pro se petitioner should be denied request for transfer of agency records from the Circuit Court of Prince Georges County as a requirement that the tribunal prepare record of the evidence presented as stated in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? (vii) Should the court close a business that pays State and Federal taxes or as per an employee who is hired in the capacity of a General Manager advertising for the business in a private vehicle?