Sean A. Clark v. Mark Schroeder, Commissioner, New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

This actions pertains to the leakage of my current drivers license #xxx-xxx-678 which expires in 2025. A leakage is secret information that exposes the omis­ sion of my current drivers license #xxx-xxx-678 as well as my previous drivers license #xxx-xxx-678. The leak­ age pertains to index number 400256/2014 of human resource administration, my social security disability benefits which I won a fully favorable decision on July 10, 2012 but I did not receive the full amount of bene­ fits pursuant to Social Security Act XVI Sec. 1611. [42 U.S.C. 1382] (a)(1), and student loan embezzlement which relates to dkt. #18-cv-9354, dkt. #15-cv-5863 and No. #16-6495 of this court. All debts were paid by Social Security Administration in 2013 a total of $50,394.90. The succinct order by the U.S.D.J on November 5,2020 was based on the eleventh amendment immunity, sua sponte, and prejudice. Under Rule 4(m) of FRCP, I was not given ninety days to serve the respondent. The second circuit panel of judges dated 5/14/2021 stated, “because the district court dismissed Clark’s complaint before the DMV commissioner was served properly, this court lacks jurisdiction over him”. Does this action violate the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendment Due Pro­ cess Clause?