Nehemiah Rolle, Jr. v. Norman St. George

iSONS FOR GRANTING WI 1. Does a state court judicial officer like Respondent Norman St. George have the right to malicious criminally slander and libel and malicious defame the Petitioner with false slanderous and defamatory utterances repeatedly to the top state NAACP official over the phone over a weekend in order to destroy the Petitioner’s reputation within the NAACP just because the Petitioner made a legal written complaint of concern of what he saw in the state court which the Respondent was supposed to be supervising? And does that Respondent have “absolute immunity” or even judicial immunity from Petitioner’s lawsuit of equity to redress deprivations of any of his rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States in an action at law and in a suit of equity, brought via Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 etc... action where the Petitioner is seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment by a jury trial against the Respondent and then Petitioner seeks to enforce the judgment or show that according the particular circumstances presented such declaratory relief was not available, See, Hoover v. Tucker CA4/1 Court ofAppeal, Fourth Appellate District Division One State of California quotingfrom pages 8 and 9; and so does the Respondent have so-called “absolute immunity” or even judicial immunity? Petitioner says no the Respondent does not have “absolute immunity” or even judicial immunity against equity lawsuit brought via a Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment by a jury trial against the Respondent for