David Louis Whitehead v. United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

QUESTIONS

1. Whether Writ Of Mandamus and Amended Writ of Mandamus should have been granted in the lower courts.

2. Whether Petitioner should have been allowed to amend complaint pursuant to Rule 15 a, after District Court Judge recused himself, after 11 years.

3. Whether fraud involving several district courts allows petitioner to file an independent action in District where respondents does business.

4. Whether District Court Judge omitted the serious conflict on his recusal, which allows petitioner leave to amend pursuant to Rule 15 a.

5. Whether there is serious fraud on the court involving petitioner’s case affording his leave to amend complaint pursuant to Rule 15 a.

6. Whether petitioner can amend complaint naming only corporate and individual respondents and not federal officials pursuant to Rule 15 a.

7. Whether Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights were violated relating to his District Court case, whereas, District Court Judge was OF Counsel with Ins law firm which had pecuniary interest violating the federal statutes and laws.

8. Whether Petitioner’s case and related litigation is Copyrights for Cash.

9. Whether District Court and Appeal Judges should keep abreast of their financial and pecuniary interest regarding cases before them.

10. Whether Petitioner’s constitutional rights were violated by the fraud on the court and judicial conflicts of interest both (Pecuniary and Organizational).

11. Whether a recused judge should vacate his decisions.