In Re Jack R. Finnegan

CONSTITUTION QUESTIONS AND FEDERAL LAWS, RULE 22(a) Why is the Inferior Officer who was disqualified in June, 2018, for Bias and Prejudice, allowed to be in defiance to the order of the United States Supreme Court, in, Liteky v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994), defiance to 28 USC 8455, and defiance to the Ninth Circuit General Order #224(4), Bankruptcy Rule 5004(a), governed by 28 USC 8455, and pursuant to 11 USC 8102(l)(A), when Legislative Statements of 8102, states, shall not be permitted to act on his own or to continue his Bias and Prejudice and non-judicial behavior? If all orders by a disqualified (Inferior Officer) are void, then the order for appointment of a trustee in Chapter 11, was not only an act of Bias and Prejudice, it was also insubordinate to the Federal Bankruptcy Code, of the above quoted sections and in particular 11 USC 8348(e) how is it possible for Marshack to claim that he was legally appointed without committing perjury and fraud? If Bankruptcy Judges are Inferior Officers pursuant to 28 USC 8157(b)(1), and can only hear and determine issues of core proceedings under Title 11 USC, how is it possible for an Inferior Officer to order an illegal Constitutional Taking of a property valued over $7 million, in violation of the 5th and L4th Amendments? Does filing for Individual Reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 Reorganization, under the Bankruptcy Code, paying the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court a fee of $1,717.00, in lieu of $335.00 for Chapter 7, complying with 11 USC S102(l)(A), Legislative T