Caroline S. Alasagas v. Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

With respect to the Laws of the United States of America under the U.S. Constitution of 1776, the Petitioner filed a Complaint for a Civil Case, comprehensively followed the Court Policies and Procedures and submitted the required evidence to be heard at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - contrary to the Respondent’s (U.S. Department of State, a Federal Agency) submission. Petitioner’s request to find justice under the law currently left unanswered on the basis of the denial for petition for rehearing asserted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petitioner is citing the Unpublished Opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to inform the U.S. Supreme Court that the decision against the Petitioner undeniably challenges the Local Court Rules & Court Procedures. The law explicitly articulated, “All Litigants without exception must follow the full governance of the court statutory rules pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - 26 U.S.C. 7402(b) & 7604(a).” The Respondent failed to comply with the court jurisdiction thus forfeited its legal rights to defend in court, with no legal standing and without legal authority? Appendix B1-B2, Unpublished Opinion, 22JUL2021. I. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit err in “Denying the Petitioner for a Rehearing,” when the firmness of the facts remain; Respondent deliberately violated the Local Rules & Court Procedures and “Enforcement of the Court Proceedings” was not factored into the decision? Appendix E & F, Civil Rule 1 Scope of Rules (A) Application & (B) Statutory Rules, The Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2071-2077.