Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Cynthia Lopez v. Eric Quaempts, et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, No. C087445 · judgment November 29, 2021


Certiorari denied · October 3, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

In an attempt to immunize a tribe and its employees from liability, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (“the Tribe”) ratified the tortious actions of two tribal employees. Plaintiff Lopez claimed in her California state court complaint these employees’ actions to be fraudulent and outside the scope of their employment authority. The California courts took notice of the Tribe’s ratification of the employees’ purportedly tortious acts, but denied any legal significance. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether this Court, to allow for more complete state court tort remedies against individual tribal employees, as indicated in Lewis v. Clarke, 137 S. Ct. 1285 (2017), should clarify existing tribal sovereign immunity law to allow tort victims to sue a tribe based on vicarious liability when a tribe ratifies individual tribal employees’ actions giving rise to the state tort claims.

  2. Whether the lower court’s refusal to recognize a tribe’s ratification of tribal employees’ allegedly tortious acts, as an express waiver of sovereign immunity impermissibly interferes with states’ rights to award remedies to tort victims.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Erick G. Kaardal
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson P.A.

For respondent
Samuel Phillips
Borton Petrini, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 03 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 07 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
  3. Aug 24 2022
    Brief of respondent The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation in opposition filed.
  4. Aug 09 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is further extended to and including August 24, 2022, for all respondents.
  5. Aug 04 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2022 to August 26, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Jul 08 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 11, 2022 to August 5, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Jul 08 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2022, for all respondents.
  8. Jun 07 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)