Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jane Doe, aka Beeism v. Jomy Sterling
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 22-10400-J · judgment March 9, 2022
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eleventh Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Questions presented
-
What is the proper standard of review to be applied in determining whether a party may obtain a subpoena compelling the identification an anonymous speaker on the service provider’s online platform?
-
Do Florida and California statutes’ substantive prohibitions on strategic lawsuits against public participation apply to foreclose such an action in federal courts?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Adam Colby Losey
Losey PLLC
For respondent
Bryan S. Gowdy
Creed & Gowdy, P.A.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 4 conferences
Proceedings
- May 01 2023Petition DENIED.
- Apr 24 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
- Apr 20 2023Rescheduled.
- Apr 17 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
- Apr 13 2023Rescheduled.
- Mar 22 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
- Mar 17 2023Reply of petitioner Jane Doe aka Beeism filed.
- Mar 02 2023Brief of respondent Jomy Sterling in opposition filed.
- Jan 19 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2023.
- Jan 18 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 01 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 3, 2022. See Rule 30.1.
- Aug 23 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2022 to October 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 01 2022Response Requested. (Due August 31, 2022)
- Jul 27 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jun 07 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)