Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Rahila Tarverdiyeva v. Coinbase Global, Inc., aka Coinbase
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-13354 · judgment March 22, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
9 U.S.C. §§ 2, The Act’s clause—which allows courts to refuse to enforce arbitration agreements “upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,” § 2—recognizes only “gen erally applicable contract defenses, such as fraud, duress, or unconscionability.” The Questions Presented Are:
-
Whether the Judge exceeded her authority when she ruled only “breach of contract” and granted compelling arbitration if the Petitioner’s claim concerns “breach of contract and Grand theft (over millions of dollars)”, when Theft/Fraud Allows Courts to Refuse to Enforce Arbitration Agreements.
-
Whether the 11th Circuit Court correctly dis missed the Petitioner’s case if she appealed the lower Court’s departure from the essential requirements of law, and she appealed under FI. Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv) whether the lower court properly determined a party’s right to arbitration.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Rahila Tarverdiyeva
For respondent
Stanley Joseph Panikowski III
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jul 06 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jul 01 2022Waiver of right of respondent Coinbase Global, Inc., aka Coinbase to respond filed.
- Jun 02 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 7, 2022)