Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Wismettac Asian Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-73768, 21-70142 · judgment February 2, 2022
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a business petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Did the National Labor Relations Board violate Section 8(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(c), which guarantees employer free speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, by finding that Petitioner violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), when it provided information to its employees as to how to revoke a previously executed union authorization card?
-
Did the National Labor Relations Board violate Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 157, by interfering with employees’ “right to refrain” from unionization by disallowing Petitioner to provide its employees information as to revocation of union authorization cards.
-
Did the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issue a ruling contrary to other United States Circuit Courts of Appeal in addressing this issue?
-
Is the case law of the National Labor Relations Board and the United States Courts of Appeal, addressing the concept of “ministerial assistance” in cases similar to the present facts inconsistent, ambiguous and vague, making it impossible for employers to engage in protected First Amendment activity?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Scott Allen Wilson
Law Offices of Scott A. Wilson
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jul 13 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jun 29 2022Waiver of right of respondent National Labor Relations Board, et al. to respond filed.
- May 19 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2022)