Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mahesh Ramchanndani v. Sunil Gahdhi, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-13231 · judgment February 7, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Statement by Landlord in an email exhibit 001 Deal is Approved but being that their money is in India, I need 4 months deposit - 1 month of that will be first month's rent. Petitioner feels the law 42 U.S.C. § 1982 is violated, and Judge Mendoza says no. 42 US Code § 1982 Property rights of Citizens All Citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every state and Territory, as enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, hold, and convey real or personal property. Honorable Judge Carlos Mendoza and Honorable Mag istrate Judge Denial C Irick feel that is not enough to file a discrimination case, Case 6:18-cv-01647 docket entry 11 (page 5/6) dated 12/06/2018 (Exhibit 002). Apparently, that email is a discriminating statement about the Plaintiff being from India and insisting more money for security deposit, which allegedly violates the rights of the Plaintiff to enjoy the same entitlements as any other US citizen, giving rise to a claimed liability under § 1982. There is no other mention of any alleg edly discriminatory conduct or violation offederal law. Plaintiffs' sole allegation that a Defendant required four months' deposit because Plaintiffs' Case 6:18-cv01647-CEM-DCI Document 11 Filed 12106118 Page 5 of 13 Page ID 92 6 money was in India is not sufficient to
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mahesh Ramchanndani
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jul 20 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Apr 25 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 30, 2022)