Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
City of Kent, Washington v. Adrian Jacobo-Hernandez
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, No. 81783-3-I · judgment October 25, 2021
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner and a petition citing three to ten dissents.
Question presented
Whether the Excessive Fines Clause provides a livelihood preservation protection which can prevent the forfeiture of the instrumentality of a felony?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Bijan Thomas Hughes
City of Kent - Office of the City Attorney
For respondent
John Robert Carpenter
Federal Public Defender
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Sep 22 2022Supplemental brief of petitioner City of Kent filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 29 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jun 27 2022Waiver of right of respondent Adrian Jacobo-Hernandez to respond filed.
- May 25 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2022)