Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Anthony Hoti v. City of Warren, Michigan
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Michigan, No. 163101 · judgment September 8, 2021
Certiorari denied · October 3, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
- On 12/11/2017 the City of Warren attorney Caitlin Murphy and the sitting juror Susan Palombo had prior secret conversations before the jury trial started in our case “City of Warren vs Hoti” as the court transcript shows. Is it an external influence on the jury when the prosecutor and one of the sitting jurors had prior secret contacts before the trial starts? 2 On 12/13/2017 I was convicted by the jury on the charge of the “Disobey lawful command”. The city of Warren's ordinance of disobeying lawful command states the following. “No person shall refuse to obey the lawful command of any police officer, member of the national guard of the state, or member of the armed forces of the United States of America. No person shall fail to disperse when directed to do so by a police officer.” The question presented for review is: The second part of the ordinance states:
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Anthony Hoti
For respondent
Caitlin Murphy
Warren City Attorney's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences
Linked docket
21M131
Proceedings
- Nov 21 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- Nov 02 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
- Oct 22 2022Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jun 29 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jun 27 2022Motion Granted.
- Jun 07 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
- Jun 01 2022Response to motion from petitioner Anthony Hoti filed.
- May 26 2022Motion of respondent for leave to file the petition for a writ of certiorari with a supplemental appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
- May 26 2022Waiver of right of respondent City of Warren to respond filed.
- Feb 25 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)