Erik Leckner v. General Dynamics Information Technology, et al.

Whether the court of appeals failed to recog­ nize that SOX whistleblower protections does extend to cybersecurity risks and breaches, especially those which were used by Russia to cyberattack Ukraine before the invasion.

Whether the court of appeals improperly denied Leckner’s request to admit the same evidence that Leckner was submitted before the record closed but the Department of Labor failed to put it on record.

Whether the court of appeals improperly denied Leckner’s motion to supplement the record with new and material evidence that had become available which could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence before the record closed.

Whether the court of appeals failed to recog­ nize that good faith attempts to file documents must constitute filing.

Whether it was the Secretary of Labor’s duty to ensure that Leckner’s evidence was put on record.

Whether the date of the first complaints must be used if the complaints were filed within the whistle­ blower provision’s filing period.

Whether equitable tolling doctrine applies where Petitioner is allowed whatever time remains under the applicable statute.

Whether Secretary of Labor (SOL) Scalia failed to recuse himself because he was General Dynamics’ counsel when he was at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, prior to becoming the SOL.