Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Robert Corliss v. Crossroads Financing, LLC, et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H049211 · judgment November 12, 2021

Certiorari denied · June 13, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. WHETHER “PREJUDICE” TO THE PARTY OPPOSING ARBITRATION IS EVEN A FACTOR, LET ALONE THE DETERMINATIVE FACTOR, A CALIFORNIA STATE COURT OR ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT MUST CONSIDER IN DECIDING WHETHER THE PARTY MOVING TO COMPEL ARBITRATION HAS WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO COMPEL ARBITRATION?

  2. WHETHER THIS PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS RELATED TO AND SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE CASE OF MORGAN V. SUNDANCE, INC., CASE NO. 21-328?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Samuel Kornhauser
Suite 1807

For respondent
Gerald M. Serlin
BENEDON & SERLIN, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 13 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 01 2022
    Supplemental brief of petitioner Robert Corliss filed. (Distributed)
    Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
  3. May 27 2022
    Supplemental Brief of Robert Corliss not accepted for filing. (June 06, 2022) (Duplicate efiling)
  4. May 24 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
  5. May 17 2022
    Waiver of right of respondent Crossroads Financing, LLC to respond filed.
    Main Document
  6. Apr 05 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2022)
    PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service