Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Arthur O. Armstrong v. City of Conyers, Georgia

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-90003 · judgment March 23, 2022


Certiorari denied · June 6, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner, though a petition filed soon after the judgment below counted the other way.

Question presented

Whether respondent on July 5, 2002, transgressed the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States when respondent acted with racial profiling - stopped, detained, assaulted kidnapped and harassed petitioner, made an entry, without a warrant. onto private areas of personal premise of petitioner, searched and seized his property and invaded his privacy, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, then acted with active connivance in the making of the DWLR, left turn violation, No driver's license false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights protected by the Equal Protection Clause to deprive respondent of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Whether then on September 21, 2010, Respondent did it again in Greenville County, VA. when Respondent Greenville County, VA sheriff Edward stopped, detained, assaulted, harassed and kidnapped appellant, made an entry without a warrant, onto private areas of personal premise of Petitioner; searched and seized his property and invaded his privacy, then acted with active connivance in the making of the FTA, DWLR, warrant for arrest false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights protected by the Equal Protection Clause and seized and impounded his vehicle without due process of law violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Arthur O. Armstrong

For respondent
—

Case

Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Orders
Order list, June 6, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Order list, August 1, 2022 · Rehearing denied

Proceedings

  1. Aug 01 2022
    Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
  2. Jul 07 2022
    DISTRIBUTED.
  3. Jun 15 2022
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
  4. Jun 06 2022
    Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
  5. May 17 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
  6. Mar 31 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 6, 2022)