Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

David Allen O'Neal v. Crawford County, Georgia

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Georgia, No. A21D0123 · judgment December 21, 2020


Certiorari denied · May 23, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Under the Georgia Supreme Court Ruling in Lue v. Eady, 297 Ga. 321, 773 S.E. 2d 679 (GA 2015), a suit filed against a county employee in his official capacity is, in essence a claim against the county. Enforcement against an attorney for attorney fees requires personal jurisdiction. Under Williams v. Williams, 340 Ga. App 740, 798 S.E. 2d. 323 (Ga. App 2017), “a void judgment is one that has a defect apparent on its face.” A bankruptcy court can release a third-party debt, even though jurisdictions are split. For example, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in the case In re Seaside Engineering, 780 F.3d 1070 (11th Cir. 2015), affirmed a Chapter 11 plan containing non-consensual third-party releases over the objection of the debtor's equity holder. The questions presented are:

  1. Without personal jurisdiction over the attorney, where the judgment against the County paid attorney is really a judgment against the County, isn’t such a debt unenforceable?

  2. Can a bankruptcy court invalidate a third-party debt?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Bonnie Michelle Smith
Michelle Smith Attorney at Law

For respondent
Daniel Lewis Wilder
Law Office of Emmett L. Goodman, Jr. LLC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
21A409

Proceedings

  1. Aug 01 2022
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Jul 07 2022
    DISTRIBUTED.
  3. Jun 17 2022
  4. May 23 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  5. May 03 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
  6. Apr 25 2022
    Reply of petitioner David Allen O’Neal filed.
  7. Apr 13 2022
    Brief of respondent Crawford County, GA in opposition filed.
  8. Mar 16 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2022)
  9. Feb 09 2022
    Application (21A409) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 18, 2022.
  10. Jan 14 2022
    Application (21A409) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 17, 2022 to March 18, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.