Lucio A. Barroga v. Board of Administration of California Public Employees' Retirement System

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES QUESTION A) DID the refusal or denial of the MEMORANDUM of Feb. 23, 2021 and the ORDER of May 26, 2021 to interpret the issues of questions of laws, ISSUES I, II, III, IV and V in the p.2-5 MOTION FOR RELIEF of October 22, 2019, February 8, 2020 and the p.2-5 PETITION FOR REHEARING of March 5, 2021, regarding retirement benefits with the California Public Employees' Retirement System, PERS, "departed from accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings" U.S. Supreme Court Rule 10, in violation of laws? a) 5 U.S. Code § 706.Scope of review To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions,. . (Emphasis added.) b) Fifth Amendment: No person shall be.. deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law c) Code of Conduct for U,S. Judges Canon 2 (A) Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law.. Date: July 2021 Respectfully submitted: [LAjUS A JSC Lucio A.Barroga