Maria Herta v. John McBride, et al.

Harassed for years, challenging subject matter jurisdiction was relevant; causation of breach of duty, tort, and trespassing without subject matter jurisdiction itself is simply frivolous matter. Jurisdiction challenged every proceedings turns into contempt court, harassment, threats, and abusive conviction. Accused of committing crime driving freely on public roads with SUSPENDED DRIVER LICENCE (DL contract never existed). Once the ID was out of contract, state of MN has no entitlement, the contract expire then. The individuals’ enter purposely, engaged in conduct that causes injury and damages. INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR OWN CAPACITY violated my rights given by GOD knowingly, diligently, purposely, wrongfully injured me with prejudice. “The lord should judge the people with equity.” Psalm 98:9 Administrative government courts, a contract is need it to be in place before that court can compel. Existed NONE! "Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proved." Hagans v. Levine. 415 U.S. 533. n. 3. • Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statutes at Large? • If is not subject matter jurisdiction, aren’t you in violation of the federal law? Federal Constitution P.319US 113