Jamal Darius Parker v. Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, et al.

Whether the lower court's and agent's who are people bound by oath to be Persons worthy of trust, decision to dismiss petitioner claim is not contrary to equity, good conscience and good reason and the various treaties of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and is not repugnant to the constitutional provisions, treaties and laws of the united states of america in congress assembled and does not destroy the rights of the petitioner beyond repair as a people called Moors. Whether Congress has delegated the lower courts and agent's who are people bound by oath to be Persons worthy of trust the authority to rule over a people called Moors and the treaties that have been stipulated and already decided. Whether a trust has arisen and a fiduciary relation exists between the petitioner and respondents, their heirs and assignees who are people bound by oath to be Persons worthy of trust. Whether there exists a conflict and variance between the rules of law and the rules of equity. Whether equity looks to the intent, and will regard substance rather than form. Whether the petitioner is entitled to an equitable remedy and equitable relief for the irreparable harm done to him as the beneficiary with a beneficial interest as a people called Moors.