Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Robert Grundstein v. Supreme Court of Ohio

Paid petition · Supreme Court of Ohio · judgment November 9, 2021

Certiorari denied · May 16, 2022

Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Is the Ohio Vexatious Litigator Statue, ORC 2323.52, Unconstitutional on the basis of vagueness and insufficient standards? Is it subject to abuse on these bases? Does it illegally restrict a party’s First Amendment Right to Court Access and violate Federal law with respect to filing restrictions? 2. Was the Ohio Vexatious Litigator Statute applied in a Constitutional manner with respect to Petitioner? 3. Circuit Splits: The Ohio Vexatious Litigator Statute is in contrast to all other jurisdictions and Federal standards. See 9th Circuit example “Cromer v Kraft Foods Inc.” 390 F.3d 812, infra. It provides no objective criteria by which a party is found to be vexatious or the grounds on which “leave to proceed” can be granted after a party is designated “vexatious”.

For petitioner
Robert H. Grundstein

For respondent
—

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

May 16 2022
Petition DENIED.
Apr 26 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
Feb 05 2022
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 11, 2022)
Petition Appendix Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service