Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo, Inc.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2021-1211 · judgment October 8, 2021


Certiorari denied · June 13, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 8% cert probability (95% interval 5%–11%)

Before the decision, about 1.8× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Federal Circuit decision below, and down for a business respondent.

Questions presented

This computer-based patent infringement case presents the same questions pending before the Court in American Axle & Mfg, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, No. 20-891. Both petitions arise from judgments entered by the same district court judge. Ameranth filed an amicus brief in support of certiorari in American Axle specifically identifying this case as one that will be affected by the result in No. 20-891. Although the cases involve different parties, inventions and patents, they both raise the same legal questions:

  1. What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is “directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Alice two-step framework for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101?

  2. Is patent eligibility (at each step of the Court’s twostep framework) a question of law for the court, based on the scope of the claims alone or a question of fact, based on the state of art at the time of the invention?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jerrold Joseph Ganzfried
Ganzfried Law

For respondent
Heidi Lyn Keefe
Cooley, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
21A254

Proceedings

  1. Jun 13 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 06 2022
    Supplemental brief of respondent Olo, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
  3. Jun 01 2022
    Supplemental brief of petitioner Ameranth, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
  4. May 24 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
  5. May 19 2022
    Reply of petitioner Ameranth, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
  6. May 05 2022
    Brief of respondent Olo, Inc. in opposition filed.
  7. Mar 24 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 11, 2022.
  8. Mar 22 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 11, 2022 to May 11, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Mar 07 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 11, 2022)
  10. Dec 20 2021
    Application (21A254) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 7, 2022.
  11. Dec 16 2021
    Application (21A254) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 6, 2022 to March 7, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.