Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Wen-Ting Zheng-Smith v. Nassau Health Care Corporation, dba NUHealth System, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 20-3544 · judgment September 9, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The District Judge in this case directed the plaintiffs attorney to submit evidence through the defense’s attorney. Can that evidence be presented by the defendant’s attorney on the behalf of the plaintiff, be updated to include the correct and missing information that was submitted? A substantial amount if relevant information to include witness statements, official government findings, academic reviews, emails and text messages were not included as evidence which would have collaborated the plaintiffs claims, and thus countering false information submitted by the defendants.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Wen-Ting Zheng-Smith
For respondent
Rachel Demarst Gold
Abrams Fensterman, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 18 2022Petition DENIED.
- Mar 29 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
- Mar 24 2022Waiver of right of respondent Nassau Health Care Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
- Jan 10 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 17, 2022)