Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Oracle Corporation v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H044371 · judgment June 14, 2021


Certiorari denied · May 16, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 12% cert probability (95% interval 8%–17%)

Before the decision, about 2.8× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

The First Amendment to the Constitution protects “the right of citizens to petition the government,” U.S. amend. I, which this Court has held “protects the right of individuals to appeal to courts and other forums established by the government for resolution of legal disputes.” Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, 564 U.S. 379, 387 (2011). The lower courts, however, are split on the application of the Petition Clause to litigation-related activity, including communications among private parties incidental to litigation. In this case, the California courts upheld the imposition of a multi-billion dollar damages award against petitioner Oracle Corporation that was based in part on Oracle’s announcement that it would exercise its right to appeal an adverse ruling, without making any attempt to disaggregate the damages award to account for that constitutionally protected activity. The question presented is whether or to what extent the Petition Clause protects litigants from damages awards attributable to litigation-related activity, including the announcement of an intent to appeal a trial court’s ruling to a higher court.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Gregory George Garre
Latham & Watkins LLP

For respondent
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
21A231

Proceedings

  1. May 16 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 20 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
  3. Apr 19 2022
    Reply of petitioner Oracle Corporation filed. (Distributed)
  4. Apr 01 2022
    Brief of respondent Hewlett-Packard Company in opposition filed.
  5. Mar 02 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Rutherford Institute filed.
  6. Feb 04 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2022.
  7. Feb 02 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2022 to April 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Jan 27 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2022)
  9. Dec 15 2021
    Application (21A231) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 27, 2022.
  10. Dec 13 2021
    Application (21A231) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 28, 2021 to January 27, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.