Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Veena Sharma v. Santander Bank

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 20-1317 · judgment September 25, 2020

Certiorari denied · March 29, 2021

Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim without issuing summons to Respondent, without any hearing, and without jury trial as requested by Petitioner is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Supreme Court.
Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim on wrong/incorrect interpretation of Statue of Limitations (10 years) is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Superior Court.
Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim on grounds of Preclusion is sufficient for review by the honorable Untied States Supreme Court. \

For petitioner
Veena Sharma

For respondent
Patrick S. Tracey
Bowditch & Dewey, LLP

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Mar 29 2021
Petition DENIED.
Mar 12 2021
Reply of petitioner Veena Sharma filed. (Distributed)
Mar 10 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
Feb 23 2021
Brief of respondent Santander Bank in opposition filed.
Dec 24 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2021)