David H. Penny v. Lincoln's Challenge Academy

What is the proper treatment of Pro Se litigants nationwide who make a technical error or other mis­ take for lack of knowledge or a misunderstanding of the law or local rules, causing a dismissal of the case or granting of summary judgment against them with­ out their case being heard and without the opportunity to correct the error; which equates to justice being de­ nied them whether plaintiff or defendant? What is the equitable treatment nationwide of Pro Se litigants in procedures addressing the disparity in privileges in local rules between jurisdictions, for ex­ ample, discrimination between Pro Se and Social Secu­ rity or Prisoner litigants concerning local rules and between aid given to Pro Se litigants concerning sum­ mary judgment and similar aid not given to other Pro Se litigants within the same State or between the States? What is the resolution of conflicting opinions on summary judgment between various circuit court opin­ ions as it relates to pro se litigants? What is the proper interpretation of precedent case law regarding the Constitutionality problems sur­ rounding Federal Civil Rule 56: summary judgment? What is the clear and equitable standard for con­ sistency in the application of the reasonable jury standard in Federal Rule 56?