Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Delva Newhouse, Administratrix of the Estate of William Perry Newhouse, III v. Ethicon, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 20-1238 · judgment August 27, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
QUESTION ONE DID THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICES ABUSE THEIR DISCRETION, CREATE MANIFEST INJUSTICE, SUBSTANTIALLY ERR, PREJUDICE, AND HAVE A LEGAL DUTY, OBLIGATION, AND SWORN JUDICIAL OATH TO MAKE A WRITTEN DECISION UNDER RULE 60 ON WHETHER THE RESPONDENT ETHICON CORPORATE ATTORNEYS INTENTIONALLY AND IN BAD FAITH KNOWINGLY COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE COURT TO OBTAIN A WRONGFUL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTRY/ORDER FOR FINANCIAL GAIN IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND APPEAL BY RIGHT IN THE U.S. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN ORDER, TO PROTECT RESPONDENT(S) ETHICON TO CONTINUE TO UNLAWFULLY MANUFACTURE DANGEROUS AND DEFECTIVE POLYPROPYLENE(ie, COMMON PLASTIC) MESH AND SUTURE PRODUCTS THAT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE IMPLANTED IN THE HUMAN BODY IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW? QUESTION TWO DID THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICES ABUSE THEIR DISCRETION, CREATE MANIFEST INJUSTICE, SUBSTANTIALLY ERR, PREJUDICE, AND HAVE A LEGAL DUTY OR OBLIGATION, AND SWORN JUDICIAL OATH TO PROTECT THE GENERAL PUBLIC BY ISSUING A ORDER TO RESPONDENT(S) ETHICON TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONTINUING TO UNLAWFULLY MANUFACTURING/SELLING NON-DISSOLVING DANGEROUS AND DEEECTIVE POLYPROPYLENE (COMMON PLASTIC) ADULTERATED MESH AND SUTURE PRODUCTS TO GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE IMPLANTED IN THE HUMAN BODY IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW? LIST OF PARTIES [X] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as follows^ Petitioner In Pro Per Respondent ETHICON et al DELVA NEWHOUSE Thomas Combs, and Spann, PLLC 865 CARBIDE RD 300 Summers St, Suite 1380 GLEN, WV 25088 Charleston, West Virginia, 25338-3824
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Delva Newhouse
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 01 2021Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- May 11 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
- Apr 14 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Mar 22 2021Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Mar 03 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
- Dec 21 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 16, 2021)