Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Judy Knight v. Ward & Glass, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Second Division, No. 117,492 · judgment May 9, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Introduction: , On 5/23/2019 Petitioner filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time To File A Petition For Rehearing thought to be due on Saturday 6/1, (i.e. « Monday 6/3) with attached Affidavit and an Application to Exceed the Page Limit. Having known that more than 100 such extension requests had been allowed to attorneys in the underlying cases and none denied she had no expectations the requests would not be approved. 1 i When no answer was received by the 30th, Petitioner spent the weekend deleting text to fit into the statutory page limit and filed the r Petition on Monday, June 3rd . These Motions were denied by the Court but not until July 11, 2019. On July 30th Petitioner mailed a document erroneously entitled ■“X “Petition for Rehearing” that presented the following questions to be answered which are now copied here. See Appendix for the complete arguments. "3
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Judy Knight
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 22 2021Petition DENIED.
- Feb 24 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
- Jun 15 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2021)