Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-15499, 18-15502, 18-15503, 18-16376 · judgment May 26, 2020

GVR'd · May 24, 2021

Pre-decision estimate: 6% cert probability (95% interval 5%–9%)

Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a business petitioner.

Question presented

Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order when removal was premised in part on the federal-officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442, or the civilrights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1443.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

For respondent
Victor M. Sher
Sher Edling LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

Jun 25 2021
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
May 24 2021
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of BP p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 593 U. S. ___ (2021). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
May 17 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
Apr 21 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
Apr 05 2021
Brief of respondents County of San Mateo, et al., et al. in opposition filed.
Feb 01 2021
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2021.
Jan 29 2021
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2021 to April 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 30 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)