Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hui Feng, et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-56522 · judgment August 23, 2019
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before and a Ninth Circuit decision below.
Questions presented
The questions presented are:
-
Whether the SEC exceeded its statutory authority under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which regulates secondary market transactions in securities on exchanges and the over-the-counter markets, by applying the Exchange Act’s broker registration requirements to Petitioners who had no involvement with secondary market transactions.
-
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in finding that Petitioners violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws when the basis for the finding is Petitioners’ alleged breach of an attorney ethics rule and when the alleged misconduct was only tangentially related to purchases or sales of securities.
-
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in finding “scienter” and “materiality” in this case.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert G. Heim
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jan 27 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
- Jan 22 2021Waiver of right of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission to respond filed.
- Dec 22 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2021)