Renee Denise Bell v. Florida Highway Patrol, et al.

~ Should a Mandated order issued by a United StatesrAppeals Court [Specifically, the Hon. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals] be struck.down by a decision of a United States District Court-specifically-U.S. District Court the Middle District-Florida, that it did-not agree with the mandated decision. T* Henceforth, subjecting a plaintiff, to consecutive appealsTo reverse, arid by that very same conduct of the District Court-the longevity of those appeals-bring the civil case to the door of the Statue of Limitations. Is this the Justice-and Judicial system that the United States represent. Further, should this type conduct be tolerated by the United States District Court-Middle District FI. in removing access to the Courts for indigent individuals. [Those that are not represented-or cannot - afford counsel. Furthermore, would it be considered violation of a Civil Liberty of the US Constitution, being that one of the five key-civil liberties is “the right to petition the government for redress of grievances [ Wherefore, why would the appellant, be denied this privilege]. [2] Did the District Court, abuse discretion in holding case from progress up near Statute of Limitations? though case is timely filed. i. j Renee D. Bell v. Florida Highway Patrol Et.al./US Bank Natl. Assoc. Leader Mortgage, Et.al. 05/02/2021 V * LIST OF PARTIES [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ X ] All parties DO NOT appear'in the caption of the case on the cover page. A-list of all parties to the proceeding in the Court whose judgement is the subject of'this petition is as.follows. ' ' ET-AL:

Larry Costanzo.

Cyrus Brown

Oaks at Powers Park-Homeowner-Association/Marilyn Vance.