David Simmons v. Earl Houser, Superintendent, Goose Creek Correctional Center

WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO GIVE DEFERENCE TO THE STATE SUPREME,COURT'S DETERMINATION THAT PETITIONER'S ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES HAD BEEN EXHAUSTED. WHETHER THE DISTRICT;COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO CONSIDER PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM VIOLATIONS: THAT THE STATE SUPREME COURT'S RE­ TROACTIVE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2003 AMENDMENT,TO THE ALASKA DNA I.D. REGISTRATION ACT,AS; APPLIED,. TO PETITIONER, WHOSE CONVICTION PRE-DATED THE OPERATION OF THE DIRECTIVES OF THE STATUTE WHICH CAME INTO 3EING AS AN EXISTING LAW, AND PUNITIVE -LY SANCTIONED NONE COMPLIANCE, WITHOUT OFFEND­ ING r THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT AND THE EX POST FACTO C..CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION-ART l,SECT£ON 10.