Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Guillermo Vera v. California, et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55767 · judgment August 18, 2020

Dismissed · October 4, 2021

Question presented

i&fyA f (\ fet? (ky /■£? ^ 'Kjw^ «r h"0' f ^£y|W1\t/A) ^O'm/w&O' $e?p/&'Ao'/^/'frs/0i&fi £

For petitioner
Guillermo Vera

For respondent
—

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Oct 07 2024
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
Jul 02 2024
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
Jun 19 2024
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Main Document
Oct 04 2021
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Aug 05 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
May 10 2021
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service